Mine Index 2533   Clark City and Wilmington Coal Company,   A Mine

From ILMINES WIKI
Revision as of 09:00, July 26, 2024 by Alan.Myers (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "|note}}" to "</ref>")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Disclaimer
INTERPRETING A MINE SUMMARY SHEET
Unlocated Mines In: Kankakee unlocated
County: Kankakee
Quadrangle: Essex
County Coal Data: Kankakee
Shown On Map: Yes
Unlocated: No
MSHA ID:
For more information about Longwall Mining See: History of Longwall Coal Mining In Illinois

Mine Index Number: 2533

Company Name: Clark City and Wilmington Coal Company
Mine Name: A Mine
Start Date: 1889 End Date: 1909
Type of Mine: Underground
Total acres shown:
Acres after map date: 225 in Houchin Creek Coal, 100 in Colchester Coal General Area of mining acres shown: 74 [1]

Shaft, Slope, Drift or Tipple Location(s)

Type County Township-Range Section Part Section
Main shaft Kankakee 31N 9E 30 NE NW NW

Geology

For more information about Longwall Mining See: History of Longwall Coal Mining In Illinois
Thickness (ft)
Seam Depth (ft) Min Max Ave Mining Method
Houchin Creek [2] 108 4.67-5.0 RP
Colchester [3] 80-130 2.67-3.0 LW (old longwall)

Geological Problems Reported

The Houchin Creek Coal was said to be prone to spontaneous combustion, and portions of the old works were sealed off because of smouldering fires. The interval between the seams was small, and with roof falls and other breaks in the roof rock of the lower seam, the gas was able to migrate throughout both seams of the mine. When the mine re-opened the next fiscal year, mining was restricted to the Colchester Coal, and new reserves west of the shaft were opened. The roof over the Houchin Creek Coal was black shale in some places and gray shale in other locations, and large concretions were numerous in the shale over the coal. The Houchin Creek Coal thickness varied a great deal through the mine.

Production

Company Mine Name Date Production (tons)
Gardner Wilmington Coal Company Gardner Wilmington No. 2[4] 1889-1893 327,036
Gardner Wilmington Coal Company Gardner Wilmington No. 1[5] 1893-1895 [6] 78,171
Gardner and Wilmington Coal Company B[7] 1893-1904 [8] 907,217
Consolidated Coal and Iron Company B 1904-1907 66,947
Clark City and Wilmington Coal Company A 1907-1909 60,144
Total Production: 1,439,515

Production Notes

Coal Report production (if available)

Sources of Data

Source Map Map Date Original Scale Digitized Scale Map Type
Coal Section files, 5-e-16 Undated 1:12000 1:12000 Secondary source
ISGS field notes (G. H. Cady) Undated 1:62500 1:62500 Secondary source

Annotated Bibliography (Data source - brief description of information)

Coal Reports - Production, ownership, years of operation, mine type, seam, depth, thickness, mining methods, geologic problems.
Directory of Illinois Coal Mines (Kankakee County) - Mine names, mine index, ownership, years of operation.
Mine notes (Kankakee County) - Geologic problems.
ISGS field notes (Kankakee County) - Shaft location, geologic problems.
Coal Section files, 5-e-16, map of Northern Mine (mine index 834) - Mine outline.

Mine Notes

Mine Images

Photographs

Notes

  1. The general area of mining shown on the accompanying map is probably a property outline, but is not large enough to represent the area mined. The additional mining was most likely west and northwest of the area shown.
  2. The Houchin Creek was listed in the Coal Report as the Danville Coal, but the Danville Coal crops out far south of Kankakee County and is eroded at this location. The surface mines in the area indicate that the correct seam is the Houchin Creek. The upper seam was mined 1893-1901 and 1904-1909, and the Colchester Coal was mined 1899-1904.
  3. The Houchin Creek was listed in the Coal Report as the Danville Coal, but the Danville Coal crops out far south of Kankakee County and is eroded at this location. The surface mines in the area indicate that the correct seam is the Houchin Creek. The upper seam was mined 1893-1901 and 1904-1909, and the Colchester Coal was mined 1899-1904.
  4. This mine was also known as the Oklahoma Mine.
  5. This mine was also known as the Oklahoma Mine.
  6. These production figures were listed separately in the Coal Reports, but no evidence could be found to support the idea that these were two separate mines. They were likely the same mine.
  7. This mine was also known as the Oklahoma Mine.
  8. These production figures were listed separately in the Coal Reports, but no evidence could be found to support the idea that these were two separate mines. They were likely the same mine.